I don't usually speak about Heart, cuz I mean, why? She lives in her realm and I live in mine. But I'm going to link this because it is literally the funniest thing I've read in way, way, way too long. I have a feeling just the memory of these few lines is going to keep me going through a long Wisconsin winter:
For the record, these are not Heart's words. They are the immortal burblings of one Satsuma, who for the longest time I thought was a troll and now just think is kind of a dolt:
Look at the paintings of Romaine Brooks, or marvel at Rosa Boehneur’s epic paintings. The self-portrait of Romaine Brooks is a classic in lesbian portraiture. Think of the women artists who painted each other and themselves, and you’ll see an entire aesthetic that even a male art historian can’t decode, but I can instantly, even when I’m not familiar with the artist.
I know the clear eyed lesbian gaze directly at the viewer, and this is a lovely portrait of the intense mind of lesbians coming right out of a painting. It’s direct, it doesn’t bow to any master, and the radience of this light is so powerful, that many women out there really are afraid of this kind of freedom in the world.
And then Heart jumps in, yeah, I know the clear-eyed lesbian gaze intimately! Cuz I'm Every Woman!
And Satsuma, while she's not calling heterosexual women who bear children every name in the book, continues the lovefest:
I’m glad you know what the serious lesbian gaze is Heart! I have spent 30 years looking for this special look in paintings, photos, lesbian conferences, and in the coffee house down the street. It is this delightful look that says I AM SERIOUS, and the word serious is sacred to me. I am a deadly serious woman, and I try to use my mind to the fullest extent possible in the world. I’ve never seen a straight woman who can have this same look on her face. I’m not sure what this is, other than the recognition that some women are of my species, and this lesbian feminist look is quite rare out in the male-stream world. It is just there!
Ok. Excuse me while I brush the lint off my ass that I got from rolling on the floor in a state of heretical mirth. Y'all just go on clear-eyed gazing at each other, ok?
The clear-eyed lesbian gaze:

I guess what steams me is that these deluded women are acting like being a dyke is some sort of holy calling, similar to nunhood or something.
I can't believe I have to say it in this day and age, but we lesbians are not running around with golden rays of womanly light shining out of our asses--we are real flesh and blood people. There is no such thing as a clear eyed lesbian gaze, ok?
There was a time when I thought lesbians were super-enlightened, but I was 17. I had a lot of delusions that came from no time spent in the real world. But you know what, I grew up and I went out and I met real dykes and slept with some and argued with some and desired some and hated some and was indifferent to some and lusted after some and grew out of lust with some, but one thing never changed--those dykes remained just as painfully human and prone to stupid non-clear-eyed, in fact sometimes just bleary-eyed, gazing, as I was. JUST LIKE ME.
And for the dykes who spent time in institutions because of their dykiness, and the dykes who lost jobs and homes and their families and their kids because of being dykes, not dynamic super-lesbians, a hearty fuck-you to you, Satsuma. I don't think you're even close to being what you blather on about.
28 comments:
ya stun me, kactus...ya stun me in a good way.
BWAHAHAHAHA *choke*, oh, sorry. yes, all right. sort of like grey-eyed Athene, I guess, or...something.
-Something.-
"Fanny, you're looking a little bloodshot today. Have you been thinking about cock again? Tsk. Tsk."
as per the Romaine Brooks, etc.: um, she does understand that it's a -painting-, and therefore any clarity of gaze might have something to do with the fact that the eyes are painted, and don't move? what, do portraits by straight people all have those trick eyes that follow you around the room or something? the things I learn...
First person I've heard that believes they can tell sexual orentiation from the eyes and expression of a painting. So...what, some sort of essence o'lurve is infused in the brush as it goes whisking and whirling across the canvas? I'd laugh if I thought they were joking.
....Nah, I'll laugh anyway. Sometimes the truth is funny. That ain't clear-sightedness radiating out of the picture, it's just a bit of fantasy mixed in with the paint.
shrug. well, everyone and everything else has its fangurlz: why not Romaine Brooks?
I actually really like what I've seen of her. I just still have to be cynical and laugh, cuz hey, I'm tainted by the cawk too.
Um, like lots of people I could mention. Like, any woman who's birthed babies, dammit.
Hey, I've had babies! Where's my clear-eyed motherly gaze? Whaah! I wanna gaze!
"I’ve never seen a straight woman who can have this same look on her face."
O, wait one -moment- here, this is mildly interesting. Someone should get a grant to inspect this! I'm sure Science would be ~overjoyed~ to explore why only a certain set of people can acheive a particular expression. ...Or, well, perhaps not, seeing as it looks to me like a load of bullshit. Sorta like Phrenology, only at least that had a chart to go by.
Well, I can imagine a thriving economy of lesbians teaching "the gaze" so straight women can get acting roles.
Or Clear-eyed Lesbian Gaze workshops for baby dykes? And what about political lesbians--does the gaze come as naturally to them as, well, real lesbian sex?
Oh wait, wrong question.
CLEAR EYE FOR THE STRAIGHT WOMAN!
Could be a hit television show, there. Could also lose Visene a lot of money, once the red eye is gone.
Go, Kactus. Yeah, critiquing wisdom based on the gender that someone likes to fuck (or just be superior with) is going down a bad path.
My mother says she can read lesbians by looking at our eyes, but then she never read me as a lesbian.
She also asserts, whenever the topic comes up, that all gay and lesbian couples feature one person as the man and one person as the woman.
As for Satsuma herself, in Heart's ENDA thread, she says these two things in two separate comments:
"There is one thing you mentioned in your post — you now see first
hand what sex discrimination is all about. Hard for men ever to see
this, just as it is very hard for white people to SEE racism."
And later, in response to a trans woman:
"I wouldn't necessarily go into a false worry over a discrimination as
a transgender person that people warned you about. Every life is
unique, and you are living in 2007 not 1962. The world is bigger, not
more enlightened but simply bigger."
Because as a cissexual person, it's easy for her to see transphobia. I mean, a man can't see sexism, and a white person can't see racism, but Satsuma as a cissexual lesbian knows damned well that transgender discrimination is a "false worry."
Of course, she also claims to be an ally to trans women while simultaneously denigrating us with offensive stereotypes about how trans women "take up too much space."
Lisa, I don't think Satsuma is an ally to anybody but herself. She spent that entire thread bashing everybody but herself.
Course, she does have that lesbian eyesight, which supposedly makes everything clear, so I'm not surprised she can see that you've never really experienced transphobia. Silly you--bet you don't have clear lesbian eyes, just kinda cloudy deluded eyes.
But...but I'm a lesbian.
you can't be if yer not DEADLY SERIOUS.
witness my seriousness! and also deadliness! SERIOUS PANTS, I SAY.
{:-|
look, if that's not a clear colon'd...uh, eyed emoticon then I've never seen one. and you know cause why? SERIOUS. VERY, VERY SERIOUS.
LESBIANISM=SERIOUS BUSINESS.
This *has* to have a macro. Must, must, must.
And is there any chance this one's a troll? I don't think i could do better myself.
This *has* to have a macro. Must, must, must.
And is there any chance this one's a troll? I don't think i could do better myself.
k thought so from the start (see OP). it's...really hard to tell, honestly. if it's a troll it's one who goes to a -lot- of trouble. which would kind of be as disturbing as the real thing.
anyway i dunno; is she any more unlikely a character than many of the usual suspects over there? at least she isn't talking about partheogenesis as a serious prospect (yet, anyway).
well, she wouldn't be talking parthenogenesis because just the actual fact of child-rearing makes women stupid.
What's a macro?
I might listen to Heart talk about lesbianism if she hadn't only discovered it last Wednesday, after Sunday School.
Great post, Kactus, but I think you mighta got yourself kicked off Heart's bloglist of Special Womyn, along with me and everybody else!
Wait....as a bisexual and therefore only part-time lesbian, do I get to have one clear eye and one cloudy? Because that might rock. Or at least confuse people.
well, as an unenlightened trans woman married to a *ack!* man, i guess my eyes are closed :P
I guess being lesbian and trans at the same time means I get normal eyes.
Normal eyes with twice the acuity of everyone else's!
"What's a Macro?"
Macros are SRS BIZNZ kthxbai.
And I've already done some btw.
what, do portraits by straight people all have those trick eyes that follow you around the room or something?
Yeah, and the slime trails they leave are impossible to get out of your shag carpeting.
That's why lesbians all have hardwood floors. It's been scientifically proven.
this HAD to be the best way to start the morning. love the macros!
Post a Comment